MENU
  • Home
  • Legal Issues ►
    • Choice of Law
    • Fraudulent Transfers
    • Good Faith Defense
    • in Pari Delicto Doctrine
    • Jurisdiction
    • Litigation Stay & Stay Relief
    • Ponzi Scheme Presumption
    • Reasonably Equivalent Value
    • Receivership Estate
    • State Law
    • Standing of Fiduciary
    • Statute of Limitations
  • Courts ►
    • 1st Circuit ►
      • District of Puerto Rico
    • 2nd Circuit ►
      • Southern District of New York
      • District of Connecticut
      • District of Massachusetts
    • 3rd Circuit ►
      • Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • 4th Circuit ►
      • Western District of North Carolina
    • 5th Circuit ►
      • Northern District of Texas
    • 6th Circuit ►
      • Northern District of Ohio
    • 7th Circuit ►
      • Northern District of Illinois
    • 8th Circuit
    • 9th Circuit ►
      • Central District of California
      • District of Arizona
    • 10th Circuit ►
      • District of Utah
    • 11th Circuit ►
      • Middle District of Florida
      • Northern District of Georgia
    • State Courts ►
      • California
      • New York
      • Florida
      • Ilinois
      • Indiana
      • Maryland
      • Texas
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • About The Authors ►
    • Kenneth Dante Murena
    • Casandra Perez Murena
    • Jonathan E. Groth
    • Amanda L. Fernandez
  • Contact ►
    • Submit Article
    • Contact Editors
  • Disclaimer
Skip to content
Receivers Report
  • Home
  • Legal Issues
    • Choice of Law
    • Fraudulent Transfers
    • Good Faith Defense
    • in Pari Delicto Doctrine
    • Jurisdiction
    • Litigation Stay & Stay Relief
    • Ponzi Scheme Presumption
    • Reasonably Equivalent Value
    • Receivership Estate
    • State Law
    • Standing of Fiduciary
    • Statute of Limitations
  • Courts
    • 1st Circuit
      • District of Puerto Rico
    • 2nd Circuit
      • Southern District of New York
      • District of Connecticut
      • District of Massachusetts
    • 3rd Circuit
      • Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • 4th Circuit
      • Western District of North Carolina
    • 5th Circuit
      • Northern District of Texas
    • 6th Circuit
      • Northern District of Ohio
    • 7th Circuit
      • Northern District of Illinois
    • 8th Circuit
    • 9th Circuit
      • Central District of California
      • District of Arizona
    • 10th Circuit
      • District of Utah
    • 11th Circuit
      • Middle District of Florida
      • Northern District of Georgia
    • State Courts
      • California
      • New York
      • Florida
      • Ilinois
      • Indiana
      • Maryland
      • Texas
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • About The Authors
    • Kenneth Dante Murena
    • Casandra Perez Murena
    • Jonathan E. Groth
    • Amanda L. Fernandez
  • Contact
    • Submit Article
    • Contact Editors
  • Disclaimer

Tag: Section 548

Fraudulent Transfers, Reasonably Equivalent Value

Fifth Circuit Defends Prior Rulings that Ponzi Scheme Trade Creditors Do Not Provide Value Under Bankruptcy Code and Fraudulent Transfer Law Beyond Texas

Kenneth Dante Murena

Fifth Circuit Defends Prior Rulings that Ponzi Scheme Trade Creditors Do Not Provide Value Under Bankruptcy Code and Fraudulent Transfer Law Beyond Texas, After Texas..

Read more
Select legal issue

Founding Editor & Author

Kenneth Dante Murena Kenneth Dante Murena
Partner, Damian | Valori | Culmo

Author

Casandra Perez Murena Casandra Perez Murena
Damian | Valori | Culmo

Author

Jonathan E. Groth Jonathan E. Groth
HGIM Law

Author

Amanda L. Fernandez Amanda L. Fernandez
Rivero Mestre LLP

Archives
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • April 2024
  • November 2023
  • July 2020
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2015
  • September 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013

All Rights Reserved ® Receivers Report 2023