Skip to content
The Receivers Report
  • Home
  • Legal Issues
    • State Law
    • Fraudulent Transfers
    • in Pari Delicto Doctrine
    • Reasonably Equivalent Value
    • Standing of Fiduciary
    • Choice of Law
    • Litigation Stay & Stay Relief
    • Statute of Limitations
    • Good Faith Defense
    • Ponzi Scheme Presumption
    • Receivership Estate
    • Jurisdiction
  • Courts
    • 1st Circuit
      • District of Puerto Rico
    • 2nd Circuit
      • Southern District of New York
      • District of Connecticut
      • District of Massachusetts
    • 3rd Circuit
      • Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • 4th Circuit
      • Western District of North Carolina
    • 5th Circuit
      • Northern District of Texas
    • 6th Circuit
      • Northern District of Ohio
    • 7th Circuit
      • Northern District of Illinois
    • 8th Circuit
    • 9th Circuit
      • Central District of California
      • District of Arizona
    • 10th Circuit
      • District of Utah
    • 11th Circuit
      • Middle District of Florida
      • Northern District of Georgia
    • State Courts
      • California
      • New York
      • Florida
      • Ilinois
      • Indiana
      • Maryland
      • Texas
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • About The Authors
    • Kenneth Dante Murena
    • Casandra Perez Murena
    • Amanda L. Fernandez
  • Contact
    • Submit Article
    • Contact Editors
  • Disclaimer

Tag: District of Connecticut

The Receivers Report > District of Connecticut
Fraudulent Transfers, in Pari Delicto Doctrine, Receivership Estate, Standing of Fiduciary

Receivership Estate, as Legal Identity Separate and Distinct From Receivership Entity, is Creditor of Receivership Entity for Purposes of Fraudulent Transfer Claims

Kenneth Dante Murena

Most court have adopted the traditional view that a receiver stands in the shoes of the entity that has been placed in receivership such that..

Read more
Litigation Stay and Stay Relief

Stay Relief Is Seldom Granted in Receivership Cases

Casandra Perez Murena

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in SEC v. Wencke, 742 F.2d 1230 (9th Cir. 1984), set forth the three factors commonly applied by federal..

Read more

Founding Editor & Author

Kenneth Dante Murena Kenneth Dante Murena
Partner, Damian & Valori LLP

Author

Casandra Perez Murena Casandra Perez Murena
Damian & Valori LLP

Author

Amanda L. Fernandez Amanda L. Fernandez
Rivero Mestre LLP

Select legal issue
Archives
  • July 2020
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2015
  • September 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013

All Right Reserved The Receivers Report 2021