Skip to content
Receivers Report
  • Home
  • Legal Issues
    • Choice of Law
    • Fraudulent Transfers
    • Good Faith Defense
    • in Pari Delicto Doctrine
    • Jurisdiction
    • Litigation Stay & Stay Relief
    • Ponzi Scheme Presumption
    • Reasonably Equivalent Value
    • Receivership Estate
    • State Law
    • Standing of Fiduciary
    • Statute of Limitations
  • Courts
    • 1st Circuit
      • District of Puerto Rico
    • 2nd Circuit
      • Southern District of New York
      • District of Connecticut
      • District of Massachusetts
    • 3rd Circuit
      • Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • 4th Circuit
      • Western District of North Carolina
    • 5th Circuit
      • Northern District of Texas
    • 6th Circuit
      • Northern District of Ohio
    • 7th Circuit
      • Northern District of Illinois
    • 8th Circuit
    • 9th Circuit
      • Central District of California
      • District of Arizona
    • 10th Circuit
      • District of Utah
    • 11th Circuit
      • Middle District of Florida
      • Northern District of Georgia
    • State Courts
      • California
      • New York
      • Florida
      • Ilinois
      • Indiana
      • Maryland
      • Texas
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • About The Authors
    • Kenneth Dante Murena
    • Casandra Perez Murena
    • Lauren King
    • Amanda L. Fernandez
  • Contact
    • Submit Article
    • Contact Editors
  • Disclaimer
Fraudulent Transfers, Good Faith Defense

Objective “Knew or Should Have Known” Standard Applies to Good Faith Defense to Actual Fraudulent Transfer Claim

Casandra Perez Murena and Kenneth Dante Murena

While a defendant who received transfers from an insolvent or fraudulent enterprise in good faith and for reasonably equivalent value may ultimately defeat an actual..

Read more
Archive, Fraudulent Transfers, Standing of Fiduciary

A Receiver Has Standing to Pursue Fraudulent Transfer Claims on Behalf of Receivership Entity

Kenneth Dante Murena

As set forth in Scholes v. Lehmann and adopted by courts across the country, a Receiver has standing to pursue fraudulent transfer claims because the receivership..

Read more
Fraudulent Transfers, Ponzi Scheme Presumption

Debtor/Transferor’s Actual Intent to Defraud May be Established Through Ponzi Scheme Presumption Based on Fraud Determination in Prior Action Against Debtor/Transferor

Casandra Perez Murena

Application of the Ponzi Scheme Presumption To satisfy the intent element of a claim for actual fraudulent transfer for purposes of surviving a motion to..

Read more
Fraudulent Transfers, in Pari Delicto Doctrine, Receivership Estate, Standing of Fiduciary

Receivership Estate, as Legal Identity Separate and Distinct From Receivership Entity, is Creditor of Receivership Entity for Purposes of Fraudulent Transfer Claims

Kenneth Dante Murena

Most court have adopted the traditional view that a receiver stands in the shoes of the entity that has been placed in receivership such that..

Read more
Litigation Stay and Stay Relief

Stay Relief Is Seldom Granted in Receivership Cases

Casandra Perez Murena

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in SEC v. Wencke, 742 F.2d 1230 (9th Cir. 1984), set forth the three factors commonly applied by federal..

Read more
Jurisdiction, Litigation Stay and Stay Relief

A Receivership Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Over the Receivership Property but Not Necessarily the Receivership Defendant

Amanda L. Fernandez and Kenneth Dante Murena

A court that appoints a receiver over property of a defendant typically has exclusive jurisdiction over such property and imposes a stay against commencing any..

Read more
Choice of Law, Fraudulent Transfers

For Fraudulent Transfer Claims, Courts Should Apply Law of Jurisdiction in Which Debtor Is Located, Was Injured and Made the Transfer

Casandra Perez Murena

For purposes of fraudulent transfer claims, courts should apply law of jurisdiction in which the debtor is located and was injured and from which the..

Read more
Archive, Fraudulent Transfers, in Pari Delicto Doctrine

Receivers’ Fraudulent Transfer Claims Are Not Barred by In Pari Delicto Doctrine: A Survey of Federal and State Court Decisions

Kenneth Dante Murena

A growing list of federal and state courts have determined that fraudulent transfer claims brought by an equity receiver are not barred by the doctrine..

Read more
Select legal issue

Founding Editor & Author

Kenneth Dante Murena Kenneth Dante Murena
Partner, Damian | Valori | Culmo

Author

Casandra Perez Murena Casandra Perez Murena
Damian | Valori | Culmo

Author

Lauren King Lauren King
Damian | Valori | Culmo

Author

Amanda L. Fernandez Amanda L. Fernandez
Rivero Mestre LLP

Author

Jonathan E. Groth Jonathan E. Groth
HGIM Law

Archives
  • March 2026
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • April 2024
  • November 2023
  • July 2020
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2015
  • September 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013

Posts pagination

  • 1
  • 2

All Rights Reserved ® Receivers Report 2023